Saturday, April 25, 2009

This is fact not fiction, for the first time in years

An update on the K-State football team via the Kansas City Star:

The message is out.

Asked Tuesday during the Big 12 football coaches’ spring teleconference call how close Kansas State was to being where he hopes it will be, Bill Snyder was candid.

“I can’t see there from here,” he said.

He clarified.

“It’s a long ways away from where I would like for it to be for a lot of different reasons,” Snyder said. “It’s nothing that has anything to do with anything other than trying to get young people to accept responsibility to do the things we need to do and be able to practice with the same intent as their coaches.”


It is such a relief to hear the truth. During the seemingly interminable Prince administration, every year we'd get the same cheery story about national titles, conference championships, magical offenses. And every year, we'd get to November and lose every stinkin' single game. It's nice to hear the truth. I don't know why I take such comfort in reading these tiny little snippets of news about a season that is still 4 months away. But I do take great comfort in it. It is one of the only things that I truly care about, that can completely consume me, in the same way as it did before June 18th. There are so few things that I feel connected to anymore. It's as if (to use a Harry Potter analogy) all of those people and hobbies from before are just beyond the veil. I am forever cut off from them and getting them back would only be possible in a pre-June 18 world. Probably, to get them back in the same way would have to exist in a pre- March 17 world. It's not necessarily a depressing fact, but a real one. A constant sign of change and evolution that life forces us to make. I have new things to love. New people in life. But to have just one constant. To have the same thrill for football season as I had when I would eagerly cut out pictures from the Sunday morning Wichita Eagle. It makes me feel like we will all survive and someday.... get better.

Friday, April 10, 2009

The Place to Be

Top 5 Financially Happy States

Nebraska Tops the List, While Oregon's High Unemployment Brings Up the Rear

By BIANNA GOLODRYGA, MARY PFLUM and IMAEYEN IBANGA

April 6, 2009 —

If it's financial happiness you're seeking for your next move, then the Midwest may be your best bet because according to a new study Nebraska tops the list of happiest states, fiscally.

The home of the Cornhuskers, Kool-Aid and the world's largest porch swing ranked No. 1 on MainStreet.com's Happiness Index, which used unemployment figures, foreclosures and nonmortgage debt to determine a state's overall financial well being.

"We don't go clear out on the edge with projects. We kind of go pay as you go. That's more what we like to do in Nebraska. We don't get the huge good time, but we don't get the huge bad time either," said Hastings Mayor Vern Powers. "We kind of stay in a little flatter area. In the long term, we think that's what's best."

Financial experts said other states can learn from Nebraska's conservative attitude toward money, as well as its efforts to grow a diversity of industries.

Its ethanol plants, in particular, have flourished and the ongoing effort to grow industry has enabled people who lose jobs to find new ones relatively easily.

In fact Nebraska's unemployment rate in February was a 4.2 percent. It also had one foreclosure per 25,187 households.

Happy, Happy, Joy, Joy for These States

The first-of-its-kind index also included Iowa, Kansas, Hawaii and Louisiana, which followed Nebraska on the list respectively.

And according to MainStreet.com, it's no coincidence that the nation's three happiest states all are in the Midwest.

"I think that on the coasts  In New York and California  we have a lot of people living beyond their means. But in the Midwest that's often not the case," said MainStreet.com general manager Harleen Kahlon. "Maybe the take-away is that living large is not the answer."

Take the financially savvy billionaire Warren Buffet. The frugal Nebraskan still lives in the same modest home he bought in 1958 for $31,000.

The Least Happy States: Unemployment and Foreclosures

High unemployment and foreclosure rates elevated Oregon to the moniker of the least happy state financially. The Pacific Northwest state was preceded by Florida, California, Nevada and Rhode Island with the Sunshine State fairing the best among the quintet.

The nation's unemployment rate rose to 8.5 percent, the highest in nearly 26 years, but these states' statistics were even dimmer.

Both Rhode Island and California's unemployment rate was 10.5 percent in February, while Nevada had 10.1 percent. Oregon had 10.8 percent and Florida had 9.4 percent.

But MainStreet.com said it expects movement in the happiness index. Oregon is expected to climb thanks in part to its investment in the green sector, which MainStreet.com predicts will experience a great deal of growth in months and years to come.

Saturday, April 4, 2009

ER nostalgia

I had lunch with the Lee sisters on Thursday, which prompted an ER finale and chili date at their house Thursday night. Sidenote: Kelsey and Kayla are living in my dream home. It's in Manhattan, it was built in the 70's, complete with olive green appliances, a panic room and bright orange curtains. I had been wondering what kind of house I should live in when I grow up, and now I know. They even have a trampoline. They are living my dream life, and I'm just happy to stop in, watch their fancy TV and get fed chili and cookies. It's so nice to have them in town.

Anyway....

We watched the ER finale together, complete with the one hour retrospective. I, like most of America, stopped watching the show years ago, mostly because I came to college. I never had an obsessive reaction to the show, but watched it regularly when I was younger, because Mom and Dad would always look forward to it. It was a show that never made sense to me as a ten year old, and my constant memory of the experience is asking bewildered questions and being shushed my Mom and Dad. The only episode that really sticks in my brain circled around a novel that someone in the hospital wrote. I don't think the author was ever revealed, but it seemed to me that Dr. Carter was the one responsible. For this reason, I always saw the show as Noah Wyle's. In later seasons, the one's that no one watched, it was his show. But I think that shaded how I viewed the whole series. In reading about the favorite ER moments and watching the retrospective, I was maddened by these vague memories of big events in the show hanging at the edge of my memory. I remember Dr. Weaver singing the Green Day song at someone's funeral. I remember some Doctor getting accidentally poked with an HIV positive needle. I remember laying next to Mom on Thanksgiving, watching Julianna Marguiles do... something. Mom always had such a crush on George Clooney. From what I can remember, he was the only celebrity she ever admitted having a crush on.



And so, with my love of nostalgia, I rushed out after the finale to rent season 1 of the series. I'm now hooked, determined to chase down those distant memories, and finally put these pieces of history into a narrative context. I watch each episode with a sense of urgent anxiety. Every new episode could unlock all sorts of buried memories. I've made it through the first 10 episodes so far, and all I've really discovered is that every single bit of the opening stabs me with forgotten familiarity. Anthony Edwards rolling back in his chair, Eriq La Salle punching the air in the ER hallway. It's such a comfort to revisit these familiar scenes. It puts me back in that frame of mind, nestled into the couch, sitting on Mom's feet eating popcorn, or watching the taped version the next day with a homemade icee. No other form of escapism is quite as effective. The only downside is that it makes it very difficult to focus on my methods of metadata standards paper (due tomorrow).

Does anyone else have favorite memories, episodes, or experiences?

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Hamlet's Not Depressed. He's Grieving.

Posted Thursday, March 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM ET

I had a hard time sleeping right after my mother died. The nights were long and had their share of what C.S. Lewis, in his memoir A Grief Observed, calls "mad, midnight … entreaties spoken into the empty air." One of the things I did was read. I read lots of books about death and loss. But one said more to me about grieving than any other: Hamlet. I'm not alone in this. A colleague recently told me that after his mother died he listened over and over to a tape recording he'd made of the Kenneth Branagh film version.

I had always thought of Hamlet's melancholy as existential. I saw his sense that "the world is out of joint" as vague and philosophical. He's a depressive, self-obsessed young man who can't stop chewing at big metaphysical questions. But reading the play after my mother's death, I felt differently. Hamlet's moodiness and irascibility suddenly seemed deeply connected to the fact that his father has just died, and he doesn't know how to handle it. He is radically dislocated, stumbling through the world, trying to figure out where the walls are while the rest of the world acts as if nothing important has changed. I can relate. When Hamlet comes onstage he is greeted by his uncle with the worst question you can ask a grieving person: "How is it that the clouds still hang on you?" It reminded me of the friend who said, 14 days after my mother died, "Hope you're doing well." No wonder Hamlet is angry and cagey.

Hamlet is the best description of grief I've read because it dramatizes grief rather than merely describing it. Grief, Shakespeare understands, is a social experience. It's not just that Hamlet is sad; it's that everyone around him is unnerved by his grief. And Shakespeare doesn't flinch from that truth. He captures the way that people act as if sadness is bizarre when it is all too explainable. Hamlet's mother, Gertrude, tries to get him to see that his loss is "common." His uncle Claudius chides him to put aside his "unmanly grief." It's not just guilty people who act this way. Some are eager to get past the obvious rawness in your eyes or voice; why should they step into the flat shadows of your "sterile promontory"? Even if they wanted to, how could they? And this tension between your private sadness and the busy old world is a huge part of what I feel as I grieve—and felt most intensely in the first weeks of loss. Even if, as a friend helpfully pointed out, my mother wasn't murdered.

I am also moved by how much in Hamlet is about slippage—the difference between being and seeming, the uncertainty about how the inner translates into the outer. To mourn is to wonder at the strangeness that grief is not written all over your face in bruised hieroglyphics. And it's also to feel, quite powerfully, that you're not allowed to descend into the deepest fathom of your grief—that to do so would be taboo somehow. Hamlet is a play about a man whose grief is deemed unseemly.

Strangely, Hamlet somehow made me feel it was OK that I, too, had "lost all my mirth." My colleague put it better: "Hamlet is the grief-slacker's Bible, a knowing book that understands what you're going through and doesn't ask for much in return," he wrote to me. Maybe that's because the entire play is as drenched in grief as it is in blood. There is Ophelia's grief at Hamlet's angry withdrawal from her. There is Laertes' grief that Polonius and Ophelia die. There is Gertrude and Claudius' grief, which is as fake as the flowers in a funeral home. Everyone is sad and messed up. If only the court had just let Hamlet feel bad about his dad, you start to feel, things in Denmark might not have disintegrated so quickly!

Hamlet also captures one of the aspects of grief I find it most difficult to speak about—the profound sense of ennui, the moments of angrily feeling it is not worth continuing to live. After my mother died, I felt that abruptly, amid the chaos that is daily life, I had arrived at a terrible, insistent truth about the impermanence of the everyday. Everything seemed exhausting. Nothing seemed important. C.S. Lewis has a great passage about the laziness of grief, how it made him not want to shave or answer letters. At one point during that first month, I did not wash my hair for 10 days. Hamlet's soliloquy captures that numb exhaustion, and now I read it as a true expression of grief:

O that this too too sullied flesh would melt,
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew,
Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd
His canon 'gainst self-slaughter. O God! God!
How weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable
Seem to me all the uses of this world!

Those adjectives felt apt. And so, even, does the pained wish—in my case, thankfully fleeting—that one might melt away. Researchers have found that the bereaved are at a higher risk for suicideality (or suicidal thinking and behaviors) than the depressed. For many, that risk is quite acute. For others of us, this passage captures how passive a form those thoughts can take. Hamlet is less searching for death actively than he is wishing powerfully for the pain just to go away. And it is, to be honest, strangely comforting to see my own worst thoughts mirrored back at me—perhaps because I do not feel likely to go as far into them as Hamlet does. (So far, I have not accidentally killed anyone with a dagger, for example.)

The way Hamlet speaks conveys his grief as much as what he says. He talks in run-on sentences to Ophelia. He slips between like things without distinguishing fully between them—"to die, to sleep" and "to sleep, perchance to dream." He resorts to puns because puns free him from the terrible logic of normalcy, which has nothing to do with grief and cannot fully admit its darkness.

And Hamlet's madness, too, makes new sense. He goes mad because madness is the only method that makes sense in a world tyrannized by false logic. If no one can tell whether he is mad, it is because he cannot tell either. Grief is a bad moon, a sleeper wave. It's like having an inner combatant, a saboteur who, at the slightest change in the sunlight, or at the first notes of a jingle for a dog food commercial, will flick the memory switch, bringing tears to your eyes. No wonder Hamlet said, "… for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." Grief can also make you feel, like Hamlet, strangely flat. Nor is it ennobling, as Hamlet drives home. It makes you at once vulnerable and self-absorbed, needy and standoffish, knotted up inside, even punitive.

Like Hamlet, I, too, find it difficult to remember that my own "change in disposition" is connected to a distinct event. Most of the time, I just feel that I see the world more accurately than I used to. ("There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,/ Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.") Pessimists, after all, are said to have a more realistic view of themselves in the world than optimists.

The other piece of writing I have been drawn to is a poem by George Herbert called "The Flower." It opens:

How Fresh, O Lord, how sweet and clean
Are thy returns! ev'n as the flowers in spring;
To which, besides their own demean,
The late-past frosts tributes of pleasure bring.
Grief melts away
Like snow in May,
As if there were no such cold thing.

Who would have thought my shrivel'd heart
Could have recover'd greennesse? It was gone
Quite under ground; as flowers depart
To see their mother-root, when they have blown;
Where they together
All the hard weather,
Dead to the world, keep house unknown.

Quite underground, I keep house unknown: It does seem the right image of wintry grief. I look forward to the moment when I can say the first sentence of the second stanza and feel its wonder as my own.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Fruitful adventures

Steven and I have acquired a pet. Click here to meet him.